IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpolrf/v24y2021i1p11-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social innovation, financialisation and commodification: a critique of social impact bonds

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Sinclair
  • Neil McHugh
  • Michael J. Roy

Abstract

Despite a lack of evidence of their effectiveness there is increasing enthusiasm for Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) from diverse political perspectives across the world. This paper argues that while SIBs may potentially be applicable to some technical policy interventions which address relatively simple conditions, they are inappropriate for the complex conditions characterising wicked social problems. Enthusiasm for and over-extension of SIBs reflects a simplistic view of “evidence-based” policy. More fundamentally, SIBs commodify citizens and redefine service users as problems and potential revenue sources rather than conscious agents. SIBs therefore exemplify a prevalent ideology of marketisation and financialisation in social policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Sinclair & Neil McHugh & Michael J. Roy, 2021. "Social innovation, financialisation and commodification: a critique of social impact bonds," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 11-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpolrf:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:11-27
    DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2019.1571415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17487870.2019.1571415
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17487870.2019.1571415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Asghar Sadabadi & Zohreh Rahimi Rad, 2022. "How can Cross-sector Partnership Promote Social Innovation?," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 471-490, August.
    2. Walker, Thomas & Goubran, Sherif & Karami, Moein & Dumont-Bergeron, Adele & Schwartz, Tyler & Vico, Kalima, 2023. "Mainstreaming social impact bonds: A critical analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Rosella Carè & Stella Carè & Nathalie Lévy & Rabia Fatima, 2023. "Missing finance in social impact bond research? A bibliometric overview between past and future research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2101-2120, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpolrf:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:11-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GPRE19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.