IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jocebs/v14y2016i4p385-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Varieties of communist system transformation and their common systemic grounds: a comparative study of China and East European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Csanádi

Abstract

This paper analyzes the similarities and differences in the structure and dynamics of party–state systems and their different metamorphosis from a comparative perspective. This approach allows interpretation of the Chinese system specifics and its transformation within this framework. Theoretical findings are based on empirical research carried out in Hungary, Romania, and China by the author between 1975 and 2014. Empirical research revealed a politically monopolized interactive and intertwined network of dependency and interest promotion among actors in the party, the state, and the economy during decision-making. This network possesses similar elements and connecting and operating principles whatever the time, the space, and the level of its aggregation. It renders the structural background of power distribution and that of the politically rational behavior of economic actors in the selective distribution of resources and in the overall drive for growth, resulting in frequent investment overheating and overcapacity. The comparative framework also defines the structural varieties of power distribution in the network that are responsible for the differences in the operation and the sequence, speed, and conditions of system transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Csanádi, 2016. "Varieties of communist system transformation and their common systemic grounds: a comparative study of China and East European countries," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 385-412, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:14:y:2016:i:4:p:385-412
    DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2016.1210893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14765284.2016.1210893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14765284.2016.1210893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:14:y:2016:i:4:p:385-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCEA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.