IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlbes/v29y2011i1p24-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rank - 1 / 2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents

Author

Listed:
  • Xavier Gabaix
  • Rustam Ibragimov

Abstract

Despite the availability of more sophisticated methods, a popular way to estimate a Pareto exponent is still to run an OLS regression: log(Rank) = a - b log(Size), and take b as an estimate of the Pareto exponent. The reason for this popularity is arguably the simplicity and robustness of this method. Unfortunately, this procedure is strongly biased in small samples. We provide a simple practical remedy for this bias, and propose that, if one wants to use an OLS regression, one should use the Rank - 1 / 2, and run log(Rank - 1 / 2) = a - b log(Size). The shift of 1 / 2 is optimal, and reduces the bias to a leading order. The standard error on the Pareto exponent ζ is not the OLS standard error, but is asymptotically (2 / n )-super-1 / 2 ζ . Numerical results demonstrate the advantage of the proposed approach over the standard OLS estimation procedures and indicate that it performs well under dependent heavy-tailed processes exhibiting deviations from power laws. The estimation procedures considered are illustrated using an empirical application to Zipf's law for the United States city size distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Xavier Gabaix & Rustam Ibragimov, 2011. "Rank - 1 / 2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 24-39, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:29:y:2011:i:1:p:24-39
    DOI: 10.1198/jbes.2009.06157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1198/jbes.2009.06157
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1198/jbes.2009.06157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:29:y:2011:i:1:p:24-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UBES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.