A Stochastic Model for Calibrating the Survival Benefit of Screen-Detected Cancers
Comparison of the survival of clinically detected and screen-detected cancer cases from either population-based service screening programs or opportunistic screening is often distorted by both lead-time and length biases. Both are correlated with each other and are also affected by measurement errors and tumor attributes such as regional lymph node spread. We propose a general stochastic approach to calibrate the survival benefit of screen-detected cancers related to both biases, measurement errors, and tumor attributes. We apply our proposed method to breast cancer screening data from one arm of the Swedish Two-County trial in the trial period together with the subsequent service screening for the same cohort. When there is no calibration, the results—assuming a constant (exponentially distributed) post-lead-time hazard rate (i.e., a homogeneous stochastic process)—show a 57% reduction in breast cancer death over 25 years. After correction, the reduction was 30%, with approximately 12% of the overestimation being due to lead-time bias and 15% due to length bias. The additional impacts of measurement errors (sensitivity and specificity) depend on the type of the proposed model and follow-up time. The corresponding analysis when the Weibull distribution was applied—relaxing the assumption of a constant hazard rate—yielded similar findings and lacked statistical significance compared with the exponential model. The proposed calibration approach allows the benefit of a service cancer screening program to be fairly evaluated. This article has supplementary materials online.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 107 (2012)
Issue (Month): 500 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UASA20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:500:p:1339-1359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.