IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v107y2012i498p754-764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Studentized Permutation Test for the Comparison of Spatial Point Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Ute Hahn

Abstract

In this study, a new test is proposed for the hypothesis that two (or more) observed point patterns are realizations of the same spatial point process model. To this end, the point patterns are divided into disjoint quadrats, on each of which an estimate of Ripley’s K -function is calculated. The two groups of empirical K -functions are compared by a permutation test using a Studentized test statistic. The proposed test performs convincingly in terms of empirical level and power in a simulation study, even for point patterns where the K -function estimates on neighboring subsamples are not strictly exchangeable. It also shows improved behavior compared with a test suggested by Diggle et al. for the comparison of groups of independently replicated point patterns. In an application to two point patterns from pathology that represent capillary positions in sections of healthy and cancerous tissue, our Studentized permutation test indicates statistical significance, although the patterns cannot be clearly distinguished by the eye.

Suggested Citation

  • Ute Hahn, 2012. "A Studentized Permutation Test for the Comparison of Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(498), pages 754-764, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:498:p:754-764
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.688463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2012.688463
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2012.688463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomáš Mrkvička & Tomáš Roskovec & Michael Rost, 2021. "A Nonparametric Graphical Tests of Significance in Functional GLM," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 593-612, June.
    2. Jonatan A. González & Bernardo M. Lagos-Álvarez & Jorge Mateu, 2021. "Two-way layout factorial experiments of spatial point pattern responses in mineral flotation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(4), pages 1046-1075, December.
    3. Baddeley, Adrian & Hardegen, Andrew & Lawrence, Thomas & Milne, Robin K. & Nair, Gopalan & Rakshit, Suman, 2017. "On two-stage Monte Carlo tests of composite hypotheses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 75-87.
    4. Laura Anton-Sanchez & Pedro Larrañaga & Ruth Benavides-Piccione & Isabel Fernaud-Espinosa & Javier DeFelipe & Concha Bielza, 2017. "Three-dimensional spatial modeling of spines along dendritic networks in human cortical pyramidal neurons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Łukasz Smaga & Jin‐Ting Zhang, 2020. "Linear hypothesis testing for weighted functional data with applications," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(2), pages 493-515, June.
    6. Ute Hahn & Eva B. Vedel Jensen, 2016. "Hidden Second-order Stationary Spatial Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 455-475, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:498:p:754-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.