IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Information Ratio Test for Model Misspecification in Quasi-Likelihood Inference

Listed author(s):
  • Qian M. Zhou
  • Peter X.-K. Song
  • Mary E. Thompson
Registered author(s):

    In this article, we focus on the circumstances in quasi-likelihood inference that the estimation accuracy of mean structure parameters is guaranteed by correct specification of the first moment, but the estimation efficiency could be diminished due to misspecification of the second moment. We propose an information ratio (IR) statistic to test for model misspecification of the variance/covariance structure through a comparison between two forms of information matrix: the negative sensitivity matrix and the variability matrix. We establish asymptotic distributions of the proposed IR test statistics. We also suggest an approximation to the asymptotic distribution of the IR statistic via a perturbation resampling method. Moreover, we propose a selection criterion based on the IR test to select the best fitting variance/covariance structure from a class of candidates. Through simulation studies, it is shown that the IR statistic provides a powerful statistical tool to detect different scenarios of misspecification of the variance/covariance structures. In addition, the IR test as well as the proposed model selection procedure shows substantial improvement over some of the existing statistical methods. The IR-based model selection procedure is illustrated by analyzing the Madras Longitudinal Schizophrenia data. Appendices are included in the supplemental materials, which are available online.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Journal of the American Statistical Association.

    Volume (Year): 107 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 497 (March)
    Pages: 205-213

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:497:p:205-213
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2011.645785
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:497:p:205-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.