IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmedec/v34y2022i4p243-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does star power mitigate the negative effect of cultural distance on box office revenue? Evidence from Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Pei-An Liao
  • Min-Xue Zhuang
  • Wen-Jhan Jane
  • Yuan-Lin Hsu

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of star power and cultural distance on box office revenue. Movies released in Taiwan from 2015 to 2019 are collected as the sample. Combined it with the data of movies which were not imported in Taiwan, we propose the Heckit model to cope with the endogeneity decision for distributors as the empirical methodology for the sample selection problem. The results indicate that cultural differences have a negative and significant impact on box office performance. In addition, a U-shape relationship between box office revenue and cultural distance is observed, which improves the cultural discount theory. Star power is measured in several different ways and consistently shows a positive and significant effect on box office revenue. Finally, our results further indicate that with the same cultural distance, the movies with distinguished cast can generate higher box office revenue than the movies without distinguished cast. Star power is sufficient to mitigate the negative effect resulting from cultural differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei-An Liao & Min-Xue Zhuang & Wen-Jhan Jane & Yuan-Lin Hsu, 2022. "Does star power mitigate the negative effect of cultural distance on box office revenue? Evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 243-265, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmedec:v:34:y:2022:i:4:p:243-265
    DOI: 10.1080/08997764.2023.2177655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08997764.2023.2177655
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08997764.2023.2177655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmedec:v:34:y:2022:i:4:p:243-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/HMEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.