IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jhudca/v19y2018i2p147-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gendered Space of Capabilities and Functionings: Lessons from Haitian Community-Based Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Vansteenkiste
  • Mark Schuller

Abstract

Different frameworks for building capabilities result in different material outcomes for women in four Haitian community-based organizations: two mixed-gender versus two women’s organizations. This study shows that frameworks deployed by the women’s organizations pay attention to gendered strategic interests by enhancing capabilities and functionings that communities and individuals value. Their frameworks resembled Nussbaum’s (2011, Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press): (1) practical reasoning and (2) affiliation, enabling combined capabilities and valued functionings in a manner that respects Sen’s demands for plurality of individual freedoms within the society. We contend that when an organization makes gender central to a capabilities approach, space is created for women to imagine, practice, and choose real opportunities and functionings of value that are otherwise prohibited. This gendered capabilities methodology addresses political and social poverty and creates a platform for building democracy, offering a central frame scalable to national policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Vansteenkiste & Mark Schuller, 2018. "The Gendered Space of Capabilities and Functionings: Lessons from Haitian Community-Based Organizations," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 147-165, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:19:y:2018:i:2:p:147-165
    DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2017.1411893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2017.1411893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19452829.2017.1411893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:19:y:2018:i:2:p:147-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJHD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.