Author
Listed:
- Khoi Minh Nguyen
- Thong Minh Phan
- Y Nhu Nguyen Tran
- An Thuy Nguyen
- Thi Ly Na Nguyen
- Giang Huong Hoang
- Thanh Thanh Tran
- Ngan Thanh Nguyen
Abstract
Despite the progressive acceptance of AI applications in various contexts, there is still a lack of research that elucidates the specific factors influencing viewers’ psychological and behavioral responses when experiencing AI-generated advertising content. Drawing upon the advertising value theory and stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework, our research examines the influence of salient features of AI-powered advertising videos on experience evaluation, thereby affecting consumers’ responses to the brand. This investigation collected 839 online responses in Vietnam and Australia, and used the PLS-SEM technique to empirically analyze the research model. Our findings suggest that entertainment, message authenticity, information understandability, and aesthetic quality are crucial factors influencing consumer experience in both countries. The moderator role of customer innovativeness towards experience evaluations and brand outcomes is identified. The current research advances the understanding of existing theoretical literature by expanding advertising value theory through integrating new traits of AI-created video advertisements and reinforcing the power of the S-O-R model in the AI-applied context. Consequently, the study provides empirical evidence of cultural differences in responses to AI-driven ads, providing practical insights for businesses to implement AI-driven marketing strategies.
Suggested Citation
Khoi Minh Nguyen & Thong Minh Phan & Y Nhu Nguyen Tran & An Thuy Nguyen & Thi Ly Na Nguyen & Giang Huong Hoang & Thanh Thanh Tran & Ngan Thanh Nguyen, 2026.
"Evaluating the efficacy of AI-Generated advertising: A cross-national analysis of customer responses on brand perceptions and customer engagement with evidence from Vietnam and Australia,"
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 293-341, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:293-341
DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2026.2617659
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:293-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RGAM20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.