IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jgsmks/v34y2024i2p163-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Switch or continue to use? An empirical investigation into mobile payment applications

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Law
  • Mark Ng
  • Yuk-Kwan Sarah Lai

Abstract

Using a push-pull mooring framework, this study investigates the diverse factors that influence users’ intention to switch and continue using mobile payment applications (apps). A survey comprising 180 respondents based in Hong Kong was conducted. The results demonstrate that users’ intention to switch is influenced by their dissatisfaction with system quality, perceived benefits, and social influence. Conversely, their intention to continue using their current mobile payment apps is associated with inertia. Furthermore, users who have used their current mobile payment app for three years or more comprise an active switching group, whereas those in the high-income group show the highest inertia and willingness to continue using it. These findings enrich the push-pull mooring framework by incorporating switching and continued use intentions, thus providing a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of social influence and other factors on user behaviors. Furthermore, this study provides insights into the impact of user characteristics on mobile payment app usage, which can benefit application providers in developing tailored promotions, referrals, and retention campaigns to meet the needs and expectations of different user groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Law & Mark Ng & Yuk-Kwan Sarah Lai, 2024. "Switch or continue to use? An empirical investigation into mobile payment applications," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 163-185, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:163-185
    DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2023.2264304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21639159.2023.2264304
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21639159.2023.2264304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:163-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RGAM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.