IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jgsmks/v34y2024i2p143-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short and sweet: How product quality uncertainty, review length and richness shape review helpfulness

Author

Listed:
  • Yiru Wang
  • César Zamudio
  • Hua Meng
  • Robert D. Jewell

Abstract

Because online reviews facilitate consumers’ purchase decisions, prior research investigates factors impacting review helpfulness. By integrating Kuhlthau’s information search process model and the heuristic-systematic model, we propose that a situational factor – product quality uncertainty – shapes consumers’ information search processes and suggests which reviews are most helpful. The literature suggests that review length and information richness positively impact review helpfulness. However, their joint effect conditional on product quality uncertainty is unknown. An experiment reveals that consumers are motivated to process individual reviews only when uncertainty is high (i.e. when consumers disagree on product quality). Analysis of over 37,000 online reviews indicates that, under high uncertainty, short reviews with rich information are most helpful. Consistent with the experiment results, neither factor drives helpfulness when uncertainty is low (i.e. when previous consumers exhibit a consensus on product quality). We present managerial implications for stimulating “short and sweet” reviews to increase review helpfulness.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiru Wang & César Zamudio & Hua Meng & Robert D. Jewell, 2024. "Short and sweet: How product quality uncertainty, review length and richness shape review helpfulness," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 143-162, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:143-162
    DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2023.2255873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21639159.2023.2255873
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21639159.2023.2255873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:143-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RGAM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.