IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jgsmks/v24y2014i2p113-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

#A little bird told me: birdcaging the message during the BP disaster

Author

Listed:
  • Gwyneth V.J. Howell
  • Rohan Miller
  • Georgina Rushbrook-House

Abstract

The purpose of crisis planning is to prepare for the inevitable. This paper examines BP's crisis response following the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion and the subsequent environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. This event severely damaged BP's corporate standing, and the company's response and management of the crisis and cleanup exacerbated the damage to BP's reputation. The company's crisis communication strategies failed amid an onslaught of online and social media commentary from traditionally passive stakeholders and activists. The resultant damage to the company's reputation saw $95B wiped off the company's equity value and the CEO forced to resign. It is shown that crisis planning needs to be continually reviewed to take account of the evolving nature of social media during a crisis; in this instance, the use of Twitter proved particularly damaging to BP. Rolling crisis plans that encompass all media are required to provide the conclusive and swift action necessary to minimise the impact of a crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwyneth V.J. Howell & Rohan Miller & Georgina Rushbrook-House, 2014. "#A little bird told me: birdcaging the message during the BP disaster," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 113-128, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:24:y:2014:i:2:p:113-128
    DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2014.881111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21639159.2014.881111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21639159.2014.881111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:24:y:2014:i:2:p:113-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RGAM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.