IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v66y2023i9p1890-1917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Q-methodology for identifying factors of acceptance of spatial planning instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Sudau
  • Enrico Celio
  • Adrienne Grêt-Regamey

Abstract

Worldwide, urbanization leads to increased pressure on prime agricultural land with irreversible impacts on the provision of life-supporting services such as food and drinking water production or habitat for plants and animals. As a basis for designing new policy instruments to protect soil resources, we applied Q-methodology to assess factors that influence the acceptance or rejection of such instruments. Using an online survey and interviews, we identified different social perspectives and their respective argumentation patterns. The results show that effect on people, institutional embeddedness, trust in the acting institutions, and the overall understanding of the instrument are the most important factors for the acceptance of policy instruments fostering the sustainable use of soil resources. During the interviews, idealistic and fact-based arguments were more important than person-based arguments. Based on our results, communication strategies in the policy-making process can be improved and tailored to the identified characteristics of the social perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Sudau & Enrico Celio & Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, 2023. "Application of Q-methodology for identifying factors of acceptance of spatial planning instruments," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(9), pages 1890-1917, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:9:p:1890-1917
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2043259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2043259
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2043259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:9:p:1890-1917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.