IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v65y2022i14p2657-2675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community-based and traditional natural resource conservation in Northern Pakistan: comparative analysis of attitudes and beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Zafar Khan
  • Nadia Ali
  • Richard D. Margerum

Abstract

Community-based conservation is promoted as a strategy for improving resource management through community engagement, while traditional management approaches rely on customary laws and practices to regulate the natural resource use. However, there is little research directly comparing these approaches. We used surveys and interviews to examine attitudes and perceptions of resource management in a traditional use (TU) area and a community-based conservation (CBC) area in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Respondents in the CBC area more consistently cited communal benefits, showed greater willingness to conserve natural resources, and observed greater presence of management. However, these differences were contingent on communal benefits generated in the CBC area that have helped influence attitudes about management. The CBC approach may also be more adaptable to technological and socioeconomic changes that are taxing traditional systems. This comparative analysis demonstrates how CBC may support conservation goals in the face of limited governance capacity and changing socio-economic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Zafar Khan & Nadia Ali & Richard D. Margerum, 2022. "Community-based and traditional natural resource conservation in Northern Pakistan: comparative analysis of attitudes and beliefs," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(14), pages 2657-2675, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:65:y:2022:i:14:p:2657-2675
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2021.1977615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2021.1977615
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2021.1977615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:65:y:2022:i:14:p:2657-2675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.