IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v55y2012i3p271-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information technologies, community characteristics and environmental outcomes: evidence from South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Joon Hyoung Lim
  • Eungkyoon Lee

Abstract

While a growing body of literature suggests the regulatory potential of information and communication technologies for pollution abatement, empirical evidence on the subject remains limited. This research examines whether, and how, the provision of pollution information through government websites helps to address environmental harm in the context of developing countries. Drawing insights from the relevant literature, we construct and test hypotheses about informational and socio-demographic factors that are likely to explain the effectiveness of Internet-aided emission violations control in urban communities as perceived by environmental regulators. Findings from regression analysis indicate that decreases in emission violations as perceived by environmental field officials are: (1) attributable to the quality of municipal websites and local environmental activism; and (2) negatively related to population size. The research highlights the potential in municipalities' initiatives to utilise Internet technologies to provide access to rich environmental information and communication channels that facilitate interactions between citizens, grassroots groups, and regulatory agencies in putting community pressure on polluters.

Suggested Citation

  • Joon Hyoung Lim & Eungkyoon Lee, 2012. "Information technologies, community characteristics and environmental outcomes: evidence from South Korea," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 271-296, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:55:y:2012:i:3:p:271-296
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2011.597588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2011.597588
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2011.597588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beierle, Thomas C. & Cahill, Sarah, 2000. "Electronic Democracy and Environmental Governance: A Survey of the States," Discussion Papers 10700, Resources for the Future.
    2. Beierle, Thomas & Cahill, Sarah, 2000. "Electronic Democracy and Environmental Governance: A Survey of the States," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-42, Resources for the Future.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Does the digital finance revolution validate the Environmental Kuznets Curve? Empirical findings from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Eungkyoon Lee & Raul P. Lejano & Robert J. Connelly, 2013. "Regulation‐by‐information in areas of limited statehood: Lessons from the Philippines' environmental regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 387-405, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ann Bostrom & Ragnar E. Löfstedt, 2003. "Communicating Risk: Wireless and Hardwired," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 241-248, April.
    2. Beierle, Thomas, 2003. "Discussing the Rules: Electronic Rulemaking and Democratic Deliberation," RFF Working Paper Series dp-03-22, Resources for the Future.
    3. Beierle, Thomas C., 2003. "Discussing the Rules: Electronic Rulemaking and Democratic Deliberation," Discussion Papers 10681, Resources for the Future.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:55:y:2012:i:3:p:271-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.