IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v45y2002i4p571-590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Air Quality Management in UK Local Authorities: Public Understanding and Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Juliette Mcdonald
  • Martin Hession
  • Anna Rickard
  • Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
  • Michaela Kendall

Abstract

Science and technology are an integral part of informing public policy on air pollution and transport management. Expectations of science and technology by society and their use by air quality policy makers has led to increasing reliance upon this evidence to promote health and well-being. This can be seen, for example, in the setting of the UK national objectives for air pollutants based on exposure and health effects. This paper addresses three questions. It assesses, through the use of focus groups, the public perceptions of air pollution and the atmospheric dispersion model output from the Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System-Urban. Then it assesses their understanding of this information and its current presentation to the layperson. Finally, it assesses how their perceptions and understanding influence their solutions to local air quality management in the London Borough of Camden. The results show that participants in the study struggled with the concept of air pollution outside their sphere of experience, and they did not understand the scientific basis or modelling used to inform local policy. This is partly a result of the way this information is presented. They did not relate the technological evidence to their opinions of acceptable solutions or they expressed reluctance to suggest specific options. It is proposed that a well-informed public would make comprehensive decisions on air quality based upon a broader range of factors, incorporating the scientific reasoning and technological information as well as emotive and socio-economic factors. A balance between science and technological understanding with the validity of local expertise will improve air quality policy making to the greater satisfaction of all stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliette Mcdonald & Martin Hession & Anna Rickard & Mark Nieuwenhuijsen & Michaela Kendall, 2002. "Air Quality Management in UK Local Authorities: Public Understanding and Participation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 571-590.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:45:y:2002:i:4:p:571-590
    DOI: 10.1080/09640560220143567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640560220143567
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640560220143567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beierle, Thomas C., 2000. "The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions: Lessons from the Case Study Record," Discussion Papers 10686, Resources for the Future.
    2. Beierle, Thomas, 2000. "The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions: Lessons from the Case Study Record," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-56, Resources for the Future.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael S Carolan, 2008. "When Good Smells Go Bad: A Sociohistorical Understanding of Agricultural Odor Pollution," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(5), pages 1235-1249, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Korku Agbodzakey, 2017. "Ryan White CARE Act and Collaborative Governance Re-Examined: the South Florida Experience," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 293-314, June.
    2. Christopher Bruce & Jeremy Clark, 2015. "Collaborative environmental negotiation with private non-verifiable information: an experimental test," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 82-104, March.
    3. Jessica Reisert & Clare M. Ryan & Johann Köppel, 2015. "Stakeholder Participation in Collaborative Watershed Planning in Washington State," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-23.
    4. Timothy C. Earle & Michael Siegrist, 2008. "On the Relation Between Trust and Fairness in Environmental Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1395-1414, October.
    5. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier & Bernard Sinclair-Desgagné, 2003. "Communication des risques industriels au public - Les expériences aux États-Unis et en France," CIRANO Project Reports 2003rp-02, CIRANO.
    6. Sami Mahroum & Simon Bell & Yasser Al-Saleh & Nasser Yassin, 2016. "Towards an Effective Multi-Stakeholder Consultation Process: Applying the Imagine Method in Context of Abu Dhabi’s Education Policy," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 335-353, August.
    7. James Agbodzakey, 2012. "Collaborative Governance of HIV Health Services Planning Councils in Broward and Palm Beach Counties of South Florida," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 107-126, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:45:y:2002:i:4:p:571-590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.