IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v37y2006i2p156-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperation versus Free Riding in a Threshold Public Goods Classroom Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie Marks
  • David Lehr
  • Ray Brastow

Abstract

Abstract: The authors present a classroom public goods experiment on the basis of a provision-point mechanism (PPM), where subjects must make an all or nothing decision about providing the public good. As a teaching tool, this design is superior to traditional prisoner's dilemma games because it creates multiple equilibrium in which individual financial incentive to contribute less may result in a coordination failure. Because the PPM does not incorporate a dominant strategy to free ride, students must individually choose a level of cooperation without the benefits of communication. Students discover problems of achieving an optimal social outcome because failure to coordinate on an efficient equilibrium can eliminate benefits to the group. This experiment is an excellent vehicle for introducing game theoretic problems of public good provision and for engendering meaningful discussion of real-world applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie Marks & David Lehr & Ray Brastow, 2006. "Cooperation versus Free Riding in a Threshold Public Goods Classroom Experiment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 156-170, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:37:y:2006:i:2:p:156-170
    DOI: 10.3200/JECE.37.2.156-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3200/JECE.37.2.156-170
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:37:y:2006:i:2:p:156-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.