IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v37y2006i2p156-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperation versus Free Riding in a Threshold Public Goods Classroom Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie Marks
  • David Lehr
  • Ray Brastow

Abstract

Abstract: The authors present a classroom public goods experiment on the basis of a provision-point mechanism (PPM), where subjects must make an all or nothing decision about providing the public good. As a teaching tool, this design is superior to traditional prisoner's dilemma games because it creates multiple equilibrium in which individual financial incentive to contribute less may result in a coordination failure. Because the PPM does not incorporate a dominant strategy to free ride, students must individually choose a level of cooperation without the benefits of communication. Students discover problems of achieving an optimal social outcome because failure to coordinate on an efficient equilibrium can eliminate benefits to the group. This experiment is an excellent vehicle for introducing game theoretic problems of public good provision and for engendering meaningful discussion of real-world applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie Marks & David Lehr & Ray Brastow, 2006. "Cooperation versus Free Riding in a Threshold Public Goods Classroom Experiment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 156-170, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:37:y:2006:i:2:p:156-170
    DOI: 10.3200/JECE.37.2.156-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3200/JECE.37.2.156-170
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3200/JECE.37.2.156-170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kandul, Serhiy & Lanz, Bruno, 2021. "Public good provision, in-group cooperation and out-group descriptive norms: A lab experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Claudia Niemeyer & Timm Teubner & Margeret Hall & Christof Weinhardt, 2018. "The Impact of Dynamic Feedback and Personal Budgets on Arousal and Funding Behaviour in Participatory Budgeting," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 611-636, August.
    3. Metin TETÄ°K, 2020. "Investigating factors affecting cooperative and non-cooperative behavior: An experimental game in the classroom," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(623), S), pages 205-214, Summer.
    4. Andreas Park, 2010. "Experiential Learning of the Efficient Market Hypothesis: Two Trading Games," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 353-369, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:37:y:2006:i:2:p:156-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.