IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v59y2023i8p1258-1282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Business Practices Improve Productivity in Myanmar’s Manufacturing Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Falco
  • Henrik Hansen
  • John Rand
  • Finn Tarp
  • Neda Trifković

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between business practices and enterprise productivity using panel data with matched employer and employee information from Myanmar. The data show that micro, small, and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises in Myanmar typically adopt only a few modern business practices, and the persistence in the use is extremely low. Even so, we find a positive and economically important association between business practices and productivity. Specifically, the empirical results show that a one standard deviation difference in applied business practices (equivalent to applying an additional 4 to 5 of the 20 business practices in focus) is associated with an 8–10 per cent difference in labour productivity. Utilising the employer–employee information to estimate Mincer-type wage regressions, we find that workers receive about half to two-thirds of the productivity gain in higher wages. Overall, our findings support the notion of business practices as a production technology, and we find that workers and managers split the productivity gains evenly.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Falco & Henrik Hansen & John Rand & Finn Tarp & Neda Trifković, 2023. "Good Business Practices Improve Productivity in Myanmar’s Manufacturing Sector," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(8), pages 1258-1282, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:59:y:2023:i:8:p:1258-1282
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2023.2218002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2023.2218002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2023.2218002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:59:y:2023:i:8:p:1258-1282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.