IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v45y2009i4p641-645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Entitlement Approach - A Case for Framework Development Rather than Demolition: A Reply to Rubin

Author

Listed:
  • K. Qudrat-I. Elahi

Abstract

This is my response to Olivier Rubin's critique of my paper 'Entitlement failure and deprivation: a critique of Sen's famine philosophy'. I have examined his criticisms in the light of Hume's philosophy of human knowledge and consider them weak in logical content.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Qudrat-I. Elahi, 2009. "The Entitlement Approach - A Case for Framework Development Rather than Demolition: A Reply to Rubin," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 641-645.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:45:y:2009:i:4:p:641-645
    DOI: 10.1080/00220380802649954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220380802649954
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220380802649954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Rubin, 2009. "The Entitlement Approach: A Case for Framework Development Rather than Demolition: A Comment on 'Entitlement Failure and Deprivation: A Critique of Sen's Famine Philosophy'," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 621-640.
    2. Olivier Rubin, 2009. "The Entitlement Approach - A Case for Framework Development Rather than Demolition: Rejoinder," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 646-648.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Hoye, J., 2022. "Famine, remittances, and global justice," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    2. Bowbrick, Peter, 2020. "Toxic famine research and how it suppresses its critics," MPRA Paper 101970, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Bowbrick, Peter, 2022. "Entitlement and food availability decline (FAD) – the use of fraud and abuse in famine economics," MPRA Paper 115133, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:45:y:2009:i:4:p:641-645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.