IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v40y2013i12p2579-2600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Posterior likelihood ratios for evaluation of forensic trace evidence given a two-level model on the data

Author

Listed:
  • Ivo Alberink
  • Annabel Bolck
  • Sonja Menges

Abstract

In forensic science, in order to determine whether sets of traces are from the same source or not, it is widely advocated to evaluate evidential value of similarity of the traces by likelihood ratios (LRs). If traces are expressed by measurements following a two-level model with random effects and known variances, closed LR formulas are available given normality, or kernel density distributions, on the effects. For the known variances estimators are used though, which leads to uncertainty on the resulting LRs which is hard to quantify. The above is analyzed in an approach in which both effects and variances are random, following standard prior distributions on univariate data, leading to posterior LRs. For non-informative and conjugate priors, closed LR formulas are obtained that are interesting in structure and generalize a known result given fixed variance. A semi-conjugate prior on the model seems usable in many applications. It is described how to obtain credible intervals using Monte Carlo Markov Chain and regular simulation, and an example is described for comparison of XTC tablets based on MDMA content. In this way, uncertainty on LR estimation is expressed more clearly which makes the evidential value more transparent in a judicial context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivo Alberink & Annabel Bolck & Sonja Menges, 2013. "Posterior likelihood ratios for evaluation of forensic trace evidence given a two-level model on the data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(12), pages 2579-2600, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:12:p:2579-2600
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.822056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2013.822056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2013.822056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. G. G. Aitken & D. Lucy, 2004. "Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 53(1), pages 109-122, January.
    2. Silvia Bozza & Franco Taroni & Raymond Marquis & Matthieu Schmittbuhl, 2008. "Probabilistic evaluation of handwriting evidence: likelihood ratio for authorship," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(3), pages 329-341, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nagler, Thomas & Czado, Claudia, 2016. "Evading the curse of dimensionality in nonparametric density estimation with simplified vine copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 69-89.
    2. Dan J. Spitzner, 2023. "Calibrated Bayes factors under flexible priors," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(3), pages 733-767, September.
    3. Aitken, C.G.G. & Lucy, D. & Zadora, G. & Curran, J.M., 2006. "Evaluation of transfer evidence for three-level multivariate data with the use of graphical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 2571-2588, June.
    4. Jonathan J. Koehler, 2011. "If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(s1), pages 21-48, December.
    5. Christopher Galbraith & Padhraic Smyth & Hal S. Stern, 2020. "Quantifying the association between discrete event time series with applications to digital forensics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1005-1027, June.
    6. Jan Hannig & Hari Iyer, 2022. "Testing for calibration discrepancy of reported likelihood ratios in forensic science," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 267-301, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:12:p:2579-2600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.