IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v23y2023i4p671-691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do rent controls and other tenancy regulations affect new construction? Some answers from long-run historical evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantin A. Kholodilin
  • Sebastian Kohl

Abstract

The (re-)introduction of tenancy regulation in the form of rent controls, tenant protection or supply rationing is back on the agenda of policymakers in light of rent inflation in many global cities. While rent controls promise short-term relief, economists point to their negative long-run effects on new construction. This study presents new long-run data on both rent regulation and housing construction for 16 developed countries (1910–2016) and finds that more restrictive rental market legislation generally has a negative impact on both new housing construction and residential investment. This is especially true for strict rent controls and housing rationing measures in the post-1960 period. Tenancy security can on average also dampen construction activity. The negative effect is overall less significant and strong in magnitude than expected and may have been offset by exemptions for new construction, by compensating social housing construction and by a flight of new construction into the owner-occupied sector. Still, on average, rent controls came at the cost of less construction activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Sebastian Kohl, 2023. "Do rent controls and other tenancy regulations affect new construction? Some answers from long-run historical evidence," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 671-691, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:23:y:2023:i:4:p:671-691
    DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2022.2164398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19491247.2022.2164398
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19491247.2022.2164398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:23:y:2023:i:4:p:671-691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.