IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v10y2010i4p357-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Universalistic, Particularistic and Middle Way Approaches to Comparing the Private Rental Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Marietta Haffner
  • Joris Hoekstra
  • Michael Oxley
  • Harry Heijden

Abstract

The paper will argue that the meaning and definition of private renting varies from country to country, and this presents a series of challenges for comparative research. It will demonstrate a lack of equivalence between 'private rented housing sectors' in western Europe and show that this arises from variations in definitions, property rights, the role of the tenure in relation to other tenures, and differences in the characteristics of both landlords and tenants. It will show that an argument can be made that the private rental sector is a different phenomenon in different countries but that comparisons are still valuable. It will argue that between the extremes of universalism, that emphasise similarities, and particularism that emphasises differences, middle way approaches that consider contexts, apply commensurability and apply theory that is fit for purpose all have strong methodological advantages. The argument will be expanded by reference to the authors' work on applying the concept of a competitive gap between market and social renting in six European countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Marietta Haffner & Joris Hoekstra & Michael Oxley & Harry Heijden, 2010. "Universalistic, Particularistic and Middle Way Approaches to Comparing the Private Rental Sector," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 357-377.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:10:y:2010:i:4:p:357-377
    DOI: 10.1080/14616718.2010.526400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/14616718.2010.526400&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:10:y:2010:i:4:p:357-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.