IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intecj/v37y2023i4p601-617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender-Related Differences in Access to Financial Account in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Salamata Loaba

Abstract

This study analyzes the factors that account for the difference in access to financial account between women and men. To do so, a probit model and Fairlie's ([2005]. An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 30(4), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.3233/JEM-2005-0259) decomposition method were applied to survey data collected in 2021 in 25 sub-Saharan Africa countries. The results show that, on average, 43.73% of men have access to a financial account compared to only 32.7% of women. The analysis shows that the contribution of factors to the difference varies according to country’s level of development. The difference is explained more by observable characteristics in high-income countries (79.6%) than in low-income countries (65%). Secondary school education is the most decisive factor but the contribution varies according to country development level. In terms of implications, financial inclusion policies for women need to be adapted according to country realities. Thus, in order for women to benefit from financial inclusion policies, it is important to encourage the education of women at least at secondary level by reducing or even abolishing school fees, and also creating a conducive environment to keep women in the education system for as long as possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Salamata Loaba, 2023. "Gender-Related Differences in Access to Financial Account in Sub-Saharan Africa," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 601-617, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:37:y:2023:i:4:p:601-617
    DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2023.2263891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10168737.2023.2263891
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10168737.2023.2263891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:37:y:2023:i:4:p:601-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIEJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.