Comment on "Hospital Mergers and Competitive Effects: Two Retrospective Analyses"
This note explains why the difference-in-differences methodology, as applied by Deborah Haas-Wilson and Christopher Garmon in their paper "Hospital Mergers and Competitive Effects: Two Retrospective Analyses" contained in this issue, does not produce credible results when applied to an assessment of the merger of Evanston and Highland Park Hospital, north of Chicago. Because of data deficiencies, an inability to control adequately for variation in factors that might affect the rate of price changes, and questionable assumptions about the pre-merger equilibrium, the econometric results are inconsistent with other market factors that indicated that the merging hospitals were not close competitors. These market conditions are instead consistent with the view of the largest payer, who opined that the transaction had no effect on its ability to obtain competitive rates.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 18 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIJB20 |
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CIJB20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:18:y:2011:i:1:p:33-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.