IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gmasxx/v47y2023i1p75-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model of income evaluation: income comparison on subjective reference income distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Atsushi Ishida

Abstract

People’s evaluation of the relative position of their income is not as accurate as the relative income hypothesis assumes. It is observed from empirical survey data that income evaluation is concentrated in the middle. We develop a model that assumes income comparison on a subjective income reference distribution to explain the centralization phenomenon of income evaluation. We conduct theoretical analysis and empirical parameter estimation using Bayesian statistical modeling. The theoretical analysis shows that the centralization of income evaluation distribution occurs when the subjective reference distribution is more dispersed than the objective distribution. Empirical analysis using Japanese data from 2015 shows that the relationship between subjective and objective distributions differed depending on social categories with different social experiences. Women had a more ambiguous distribution than men. Among men, those aged 45–54 had a subjective distribution closest to the objective distribution. Thus, the subjective reference income distributions that potentially define people’s evaluation of their income and their differences based on social category were only clarified by constructing the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Atsushi Ishida, 2023. "A model of income evaluation: income comparison on subjective reference income distribution," The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 75-96, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gmasxx:v:47:y:2023:i:1:p:75-96
    DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2021.1972417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0022250X.2021.1972417
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0022250X.2021.1972417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gmasxx:v:47:y:2023:i:1:p:75-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gmas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.