IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v52y2026i1p1-31.html

Divided industries, special interest institutions, and trade policy

Author

Listed:
  • Sujin Cha
  • Iain Osgood

Abstract

Intra-industry trade and offshoring create divisions within industries between pro- and anti-integration firms: what are the effects of these disagreements on trade policy outcomes? Special interest institutions—rules and regulations which empower all interest groups, but especially large firms and trade associations—suggest an answer. In industries where firms are uniformly anti-trade, greater special interest voice should raise trade barriers. In industries where large firms are pro-trade and smaller firms are anti-trade, special interest institutions will lead to lower trade barriers since big firms hold advantages in political action. We test these claims with one kind of special interest institutions—rules on corporate contributions to parties and candidates—and using data on tariffs, trade, and global value chain integration across hundreds of countries and thousands of products. We contribute to the literature on domestic political institutions and trade policy and explain how political institutions shape the influence of pro-globalization firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sujin Cha & Iain Osgood, 2026. "Divided industries, special interest institutions, and trade policy," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 1-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:52:y:2026:i:1:p:1-31
    DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2025.2584980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050629.2025.2584980
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050629.2025.2584980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:52:y:2026:i:1:p:1-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.