IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v51y2025i6p965-991.html

Reluctant ratifiers: The crime of aggression at the International Criminal Court

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo Chiozza
  • Joseph M. Grieco

Abstract

A unanimous agreement among state parties to the Rome Statute of 1998 to make the crime of aggression an operational part of the Rome Statute and the International Criminal Court (ICC) was the key result of the first Review Conference for the Statute in June 2010 in Kampala, Uganda. Yet, as of December 2024, only forty-six of the 125 state parties to the Rome Statute have ratified the Kampala Amendments. Our paper seeks to identify the political conditions that may have contributed to this limited follow-through by Rome Statute members on the crime of aggression. We find that the Amendments have been accepted by Rome Statute signatories that have shown a low propensity to initiate military disputes; face less threatening security environments; and are wealthy, democratic, and follow domestic legal traditions that make it less costly to join international treaties. The Kampala experience demonstrates once more that states exercise great political discernment in electing to adhere to international laws, and are reluctant to embrace agreements that entail a gap between provisions in them and their foreseeable future conduct.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Chiozza & Joseph M. Grieco, 2025. "Reluctant ratifiers: The crime of aggression at the International Criminal Court," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 965-991, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:965-991
    DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2025.2556327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050629.2025.2556327
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050629.2025.2556327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:51:y:2025:i:6:p:965-991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.