IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v51y2025i4p598-638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is trade the enemy of environment?: Congressional voting on environmental policies after the China shock

Author

Listed:
  • RyuGyung Park

Abstract

How does trade competition affect support for environmental protection? On the one hand, import shocks can dampen support for environmental protection, as international trade can lead to a race to the bottom or a regulatory chill. On the other hand, import competition can drive ‘dirty’ industries and firms out of business, reducing opposition to pro-environment legislation. The impact of import shocks on environmental protection is thus an empirical question. I leverage a sudden increase in Chinese imports in the United States after the two countries normalized their trade relations. I examine how import shocks experienced by each congressional district affect the pro-environmental score of the district’s representative in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1992 to 2014. My results show that bigger import shocks are positively associated with higher pro-environmental scores of the legislators. The findings suggest that as import shocks decrease the size of dirty industries, it paves the way for the legislators to pursue more pro-environmental policies.

Suggested Citation

  • RyuGyung Park, 2025. "Is trade the enemy of environment?: Congressional voting on environmental policies after the China shock," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 598-638, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:51:y:2025:i:4:p:598-638
    DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2025.2502363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050629.2025.2502363
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050629.2025.2502363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:51:y:2025:i:4:p:598-638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.