IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v35y2009i1p30-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probing the Democratic Peace Argument Using Linguistic Fuzzy Logic

Author

Listed:
  • Badredine Arfi

Abstract

Why have the numerous debates on the “democratic peace” remained inconclusive? In addressing this question, the paper examines causality in social sciences by using propositional calculus in the framework of linguistic fuzzy logic. The paper does this by taking into account the possibility that some causal relations might be more or less of a sufficient type while others might be more or less of a necessary type, and while still others might be of both types to a lesser or greater degree of truth. The paper shows that depending on how much more or less democratic the two states are, and depending on how much more or less they feel threatened by one another, this more or less sufficiently causes a more or less possibility of fighting between the two states. Therefore, the lack of agreement on the possibility of a democratic peace is strictly speaking neither a problem of empirical validation, nor one of theoretical explanation, although these are still important issues. Instead, the lack of agreement has much to do with taking for granted a Boolean logic approach as a framework for validating the democratic peace argument. A linguistic fuzzy-logic framework predicts a much more diverse set of conclusions than just whether or not two democracies go to war.

Suggested Citation

  • Badredine Arfi, 2009. "Probing the Democratic Peace Argument Using Linguistic Fuzzy Logic," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 30-57, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:35:y:2009:i:1:p:30-57
    DOI: 10.1080/03050620902743838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050620902743838
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050620902743838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Badredine Arfi, 2006. "Linguistic Fuzzy-Logic Game Theory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(1), pages 28-57, February.
    2. Arfi, Badredine, 2005. "Fuzzy Decision Making in Politics: A Linguistic Fuzzy-Set Approach (LFSA)," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 23-56, January.
    3. Dina A. Zinnes, 2004. "Constructing Political Logic," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(3), pages 430-454, June.
    4. Steve Chan, 2003. "Explaining War Termination: a Boolean Analysis of Causes," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 40(1), pages 49-66, January.
    5. Badredine Arfi, 2006. "Linguistic Fuzzy-Logic Social Game of Cooperation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 18(4), pages 471-537, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Badredine Arfi, 2013. "Causality in social theory via linguistic fuzzy logic," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 853-880, February.
    2. Ben Heylen & Mike Nachtegael, 2013. "The integration of fuzzy sets and statistics: toward strict falsification in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3185-3200, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anjali Singh & Anjana Gupta, 2018. "Matrix Games with Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Information," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Svajone Bekesiene & Serhii Mashchenko, 2023. "On Nash Equilibria in a Finite Game for Fuzzy Sets of Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Scott R. Eliason & Robin Stryker, 2009. "Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Descriptive Measures in Fuzzy-Set Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 38(1), pages 102-146, August.
    4. Samuel R. Lucas, 2009. "Stratification Theory, Socioeconomic Background, and Educational Attainment," Rationality and Society, , vol. 21(4), pages 459-511, November.
    5. David Opresnik & Maurizio Fiasché & Marco Taisch & Manuel Hirsch, 2017. "An evolving fuzzy inference system for extraction of rule set for planning a product–service strategy," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 131-147, June.
    6. Badredine Arfi, 2006. "Linguistic Fuzzy-Logic Game Theory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(1), pages 28-57, February.
    7. Badredine Arfi, 2006. "Linguistic Fuzzy-Logic Social Game of Cooperation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 18(4), pages 471-537, November.
    8. David Opresnik & Maurizio Fiasché & Marco Taisch & Manuel Hirsch, 0. "An evolving fuzzy inference system for extraction of rule set for planning a product–service strategy," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    9. Badredine Arfi, 2013. "Causality in social theory via linguistic fuzzy logic," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 853-880, February.
    10. Gries Thomas & Palnau Irene, 2015. "Sustaining Civil Peace: A Configurational Comparative Analysis," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(4), pages 467-478, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:35:y:2009:i:1:p:30-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.