IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v42y2013i1p70-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

But That Is Unfair Professor: Using a Grade Structure to Help Students Understand Income Quintiles

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Wunder

Abstract

Economic instructors exploring issues of income disparities will often be facing students who are apathetic towards the topic. Although income disparities have grown in the US, the university experience is still overwhelmingly dominated by students coming from middle and upper class families who will rarely have personal experiences with poverty which may be part of the reason why so many students lack interest. By suggesting that a flat uniform grade distribution system will be used in the class, students often become frightened by the inevitable outcome that a large percent of the class will automatically receive low grades. This emotional reaction can then be used as an anchoring point for students to recognize the inevitability of poverty with respect to capitalist systems. This method almost always provokes heated and interesting classroom conversations and forces many students to rethink the issue of income inequality in the US.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Wunder, 2013. "But That Is Unfair Professor: Using a Grade Structure to Help Students Understand Income Quintiles," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 70-87, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:42:y:2013:i:1:p:70-87
    DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2012.684100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2012.684100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:42:y:2013:i:1:p:70-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.