IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v28y2022i4p166-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Division of Household Labor in the United States: How Does Culture Operate?

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Marcén
  • Marina Morales

Abstract

This article examines the ways in which culture plays a role in the gender division of household labor. To explore this issue, the study uses data on early-arrival first- and second-generation immigrants living in the United States who have a married/unmarried partner present in the household. Because all of these individuals have grown up under the same laws, institutions, and economic conditions that prevail in the US, the differences between them in the gender division of housework may be attributed to cultural differences in their countries of ancestry. The study finds that the stronger the culture of gender equality in the country of ancestry, the greater the equality in immigrants’ current division of housework. This result is maintained when considering both housework and childcare as household labor. This work is extended by examining how culture operates and is transmitted, and whether culture may influence the work–life balance.HIGHLIGHTS Cultural norms in the country of origin determine allocation of household tasks for immigrants in the host country.More gender-equal norms are associated with a lower gender gap in housework time.Culture affects how and when housework is performed in family life, impacting couples’ work–life balance.Policies aimed at transforming gender norms can help to achieve gender equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Marcén & Marina Morales, 2022. "Gender Division of Household Labor in the United States: How Does Culture Operate?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 166-193, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:166-193
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2022.2078852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2022.2078852
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2022.2078852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:166-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.