IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v23y2015i12p2566-2581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is really different between cohousing and gated communities?

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Chiodelli

Abstract

The paper focuses on differences and similarities between two types of intentional private residential communities: cohousing and gated communities. The academic debate is dominated by the view that cohousing and gated communities are completely different phenomena in terms of aims, goals, nature and characteristics. However, I do not find these opinions entirely convincing: hence, in this paper, I shall discuss some of their weaknesses with regard to the (alleged) differences between cohousing and gated communities in terms of the reasons guiding the choice of the community, openness of communal spaces and the speculative nature of the projects. Some critical perspectives in terms of public policy are introduced in the last part of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Chiodelli, 2015. "What is really different between cohousing and gated communities?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(12), pages 2566-2581, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:23:y:2015:i:12:p:2566-2581
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1096915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2015.1096915
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2015.1096915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Otchere-Darko, 2023. "Scaling-up degrowth: Re-imagining institutional responses to climate change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 1316-1325, May.
    2. Jim Hudson & Kath Scanlon & Chihiro Udagawa & Melissa Fernández Arrigoitia & Mara Ferreri & Karen West, 2021. "‘A Slow Build-Up of a History of Kindness’: Exploring the Potential of Community-Led Housing in Alleviating Loneliness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Viktor Bukovszki & Gabriella Dóci & András Reith, 2021. "Coding Engines in Participatory Social Housing Design—A Case to Revisit Pattern Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:23:y:2015:i:12:p:2566-2581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.