IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v28y2022i4-5p326-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short-sale deregulation and corporate tax aggressiveness: evidence from the Chinese market

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Cao
  • Yizhe Dong
  • Tianxiao Guo
  • Diandian Ma

Abstract

We study whether short selling affects corporate tax aggressiveness. Exploiting staggered short-sale deregulation in the Chinese stock market as a source of variation in market pressure and monitoring, our difference-in-differences estimates show that the introduction of a short-selling scheme significantly discourages pilot firms from engaging in aggressive tax avoidance, in contrast to the findings by Luo, Ni, and Tian (2020. “Short Selling and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Insights from a Financial Constraint View.” Pacific–Basin Finance Journal 61: 101323.). We also find that the negative effect of short selling on tax aggressiveness is more pronounced for firms that have high advertising costs, high institutional holdings, and CEO duality, and are located in regions with weak tax law enforcement. We further reveal that short selling has an indirect effect on tax aggressiveness through the additional external pressure exerted by auditors, media, and financial analysts, and lastly, challenge the main analysis by Luo, Ni, and Tian (2020). Our evidence highlights the monitoring and disciplinary roles that short sellers play in determining the level of corporate tax aggressiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Cao & Yizhe Dong & Tianxiao Guo & Diandian Ma, 2022. "Short-sale deregulation and corporate tax aggressiveness: evidence from the Chinese market," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4-5), pages 326-355, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:28:y:2022:i:4-5:p:326-355
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2021.1958890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1958890
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1958890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:28:y:2022:i:4-5:p:326-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.