IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v25y2019i1p79-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The commitment value of takeover defenses

Author

Listed:
  • William C. Johnson
  • Sungwoo Nam
  • Sangho Yi

Abstract

We investigate how takeover defenses can facilitate a firm’s value-increasing stakeholder relationships by bonding its commitment to respect stakeholders’ appropriable quasi-rents in the firm. For this purpose, we develop two variations of the B-index of takeover defenses which are specifically designed to capture the bonding benefit of takeover defenses. We find evidence that some takeover defenses, but not all, provide a bonding benefit in terms of facilitation of a firm’s value-increasing stakeholder relationships. This implies that a firm must selectively adopt the most effective takeover defenses to achieve the desired corporate goals.

Suggested Citation

  • William C. Johnson & Sungwoo Nam & Sangho Yi, 2019. "The commitment value of takeover defenses," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 79-100, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:25:y:2019:i:1:p:79-100
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2018.1481444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2018.1481444
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2018.1481444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malhotra, Shavin & Morgan, Horatio M. & Zhu, Pengcheng, 2020. "Corporate governance and firms’ acquisition behavior: The role of antitakeover provisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 26-37.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:25:y:2019:i:1:p:79-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.