IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v21y2012i4p797-823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Auditors be Independent? Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Client Type

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Koch
  • Martin Weber
  • Jens Wüstemann

Abstract

Recent regulatory initiatives stress that an independent oversight board, rather than the management board, should assume the role of auditors' client. In an experiment, we test whether the type of client affects auditors' independence. Unique features of the German institutional setting enable us to realistically vary the type of auditors' client as our treatment variable: we portray the client either as the management preferring aggressive accounting or the oversight board preferring conservative accounting. We measure auditors' perceived client retention incentives and accountability pressure in a post-experiment questionnaire to capture potential threats to independence. We find that the type of auditors' client affects auditors' behaviour contingent on the degree of the perceived threats to independence. Our findings imply that both client retention incentives and accountability pressure represent distinctive threats to auditors' independence and that the effectiveness of an oversight board in enhancing auditors' independence depends on the underlying threat.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Koch & Martin Weber & Jens Wüstemann, 2012. "Can Auditors be Independent? Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Client Type," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 797-823, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:21:y:2012:i:4:p:797-823
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2011.629416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2011.629416
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:spacre:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:10-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:eee:advacc:v:38:y:2017:i:c:p:75-87 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:21:y:2012:i:4:p:797-823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.