IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v40y2021i2p177-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homogeneous vs. heterogeneous transition functions in panel smooth transition regressions

Author

Listed:
  • Matei Demetrescu
  • Julian S. Leppin
  • Stefan Reitz

Abstract

(Panel) Smooth Transition Regressions substantially gained in popularity due to their flexibility in modeling regression coefficients as homogeneous or heterogeneous functions of various transition variables. In the estimation process, however, researchers typically face a tradeoff in the sense that a single (homogeneous) transition function may yield biased estimates if the true model is heterogeneous, while the latter specification is accompanied by convergence problems and longer estimation time, rendering their application less appealing. This paper proposes a Lagrange multiplier test indicating whether the homogeneous smooth transition regression model is appropriate or not. We provide time series and panel versions of the test and discuss the joint N, T limiting behavior of the test statistic under cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity. The empirical size and power of the test are evaluated by Monte Carlo simulations. An application to US stock return predictability illustrates the practical usefulness of the proposed procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Matei Demetrescu & Julian S. Leppin & Stefan Reitz, 2021. "Homogeneous vs. heterogeneous transition functions in panel smooth transition regressions," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 177-196, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:40:y:2021:i:2:p:177-196
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2020.1773666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2020.1773666
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07474938.2020.1773666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:40:y:2021:i:2:p:177-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.