A Note on Testing Covariance Stationarity
In a recent article, Xiao and Lima (2007) show numerically that the stationarity test of Kwiatkowski et al. (1992) has power close to size when the volatility of the innovation process follows a linear trend. In this article, highlighting published results in Cavaliere and Taylor (2005), we show that this observation does not in general hold under time-varying volatility. We also propose alternative tests of covariance stationarity which we show to improve upon the power properties of the tests proposed in Xiao and Lima (2007) against changes in the unconditional variance. Practical recommendations are also made.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 28 (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:364-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.