IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Tests for a Unit Root Using Three-Regime TAR Models: Power Comparison and Some Applications

Listed author(s):
  • Daiki Maki
Registered author(s):

    Tests for a unit root using three-regime threshold autoregressive (TAR) models play a significant role in the empirical analysis of some economic theories. This article compares the powers of recently proposed unit root tests in three-regime TAR models using Monte Carlo experiments. The following results are obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations: Kapetanios and Shin's (2006) Wsup, Wave, and Wexp statistics, which degenerate with respect to the threshold parameters under the null hypothesis, have a better power in the three-regime TAR process with a relatively narrow band of a unit root process and a small sample, whereas their statistics do not perform well when the threshold and sample size increase; Bec et al.'s (2004, BBC) sup W and Park and Shintani's (2005) inf-t statistics and their restricted models, which do not degenerate with respect to the threshold parameters in the limit, perform poorly in the three-regime TAR process with a small threshold even when compared with the Dickey-Fuller test, whereas their statistics perform better in the case of a large threshold; sup W, inf-t, and their restricted models perform much better when the sample size and threshold increase and the outer regimes have a rapid convergence. In order to substantiate the use of our Monte Carlo results for some of the applied work, we apply these tests to the real exchange rates for many countries.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Econometric Reviews.

    Volume (Year): 28 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 335-363

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:335-363
    DOI: 10.1080/07474930802458893
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:335-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.