Some comments on model development and posterior existence
We wish to congratulate John Geweke on producing such an interesting and complete paper. We are delighted to see that serious attempts to make Bayesian methods more generally understood and available are being undertaken. In addition, a number of quite challenging issues is addressed here. Whereas we agree with most of what is stated in the paper, it is our (perceived) duty to single out those things that we feel are more contentious. However, we hope that this can lead to a stimulating discussion of general interest and hopefully to our better understanding of these issues.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 18 (1999)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/LECR20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:18:y:1999:i:1:p:89-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.