IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/edecon/v34y2026i2p267-291.html

Labor market outcomes of formal vocational education and training: a meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna Kemper
  • Audrey Au Yong Lyn
  • Patrick McDonald
  • Ursula Renold

Abstract

This meta-analysis synthesizes 39 studies (1990–2022) on the effects of formal Vocational Education and Training (VET) on labor market outcomes using causal counterfactual methods. Using Hedges’ g and Robust Variance Estimation, we find that VET versus general education yields a small positive effect (g = 0.021), increasing employment by 4.8 percentage points (p.p.) but showing no impact on wages. Based on 27 studies, VET compared to an unrestricted control group, including individuals with no specific education type, shows a medium effect (g = 0.071), boosting employment by 11.7 p.p. and wages by 37.6 p.p.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna Kemper & Audrey Au Yong Lyn & Patrick McDonald & Ursula Renold, 2026. "Labor market outcomes of formal vocational education and training: a meta-analysis," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 267-291, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:267-291
    DOI: 10.1080/09645292.2025.2579799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09645292.2025.2579799
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09645292.2025.2579799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:267-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.