IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v39y2018i1p104-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From aid negotiation to aid effectiveness: the case of food and nutrition security in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre-Marie Aubert
  • Matthieu Brun
  • Peter Agamile
  • Sébastien Treyer

Abstract

This paper looks at aid ownership through the lens of negotiations that take place between a country and its development partners (DPs). Based on the case of Ethiopian food security policies, it combines a structural analysis of the negotiation capital of both parties with an actor-oriented analysis of the institutional setting through which negotiations take place. First, it shows that the growing influence donors have come to have in the shaping of Ethiopian public policies results from the relative loss of legitimacy the government has experienced after the 2005 political crisis and its greater need for external economic assistance. Second, the more recent creation of a negotiation platform between the Government of Ethiopia (GoE) and its DPs has allowed the GoE to enhance donor’s alignment with its development policies and regain some control over its development agenda, while giving them more room to contribute to several food and nutrition security policy reforms which have been positively evaluated. The paper stresses the need for donors to better recognise the centrality of politics in any aid intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre-Marie Aubert & Matthieu Brun & Peter Agamile & Sébastien Treyer, 2018. "From aid negotiation to aid effectiveness: the case of food and nutrition security in Ethiopia," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 104-121, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:39:y:2018:i:1:p:104-121
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1368379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2017.1368379
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2017.1368379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:39:y:2018:i:1:p:104-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.