IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v31y2016i6p714-728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ageing in Unsuitable Places

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Severinsen
  • Mary Breheny
  • Christine Stephens

Abstract

Much of the focus of ageing in place policy is concerned with the provision of support to enable older people to age in the community in residences adapted to their needs. There has been little examination of why older people make choices to age in particular places in later life. In this paper, we drew on 143 interviews with older people in New Zealand to examine the narratives older people use to describe their housing preferences in later life. Older people drew upon personal and public narratives to story housing in later life, and construct four identifiable identities: ‘practical planner’, ‘rugged pioneer’, ‘where I belong’ and ‘rooted in place’. This analysis demonstrates that some older people do narrate decisions to age in ‘sensible’ places with good access to services and have clear plans for change as their physical health declines. Other older people live proudly in unsuitable places and do not wish for support to move or accommodations made to their housing. These older people draw upon narratives of place as foundational to their identity, of relationships with people both living and dead as social relationships that bolster their identity and of housing as part of situated lifelong narratives. Both the situation of their home and the condition of the home provide the backdrop to alternative narrative identities that require them to remain in housing because of, or irrespective of, its unsuitability. To understand the limitations and the possibilities of ageing in place, we need to identify the multiple narratives that structure the lives of older people. By doing so, we can support ageing in place processes that do not disrupt the strong identities that have been developed in and through housing.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Severinsen & Mary Breheny & Christine Stephens, 2016. "Ageing in Unsuitable Places," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 714-728, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:31:y:2016:i:6:p:714-728
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1122175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2015.1122175
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2015.1122175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Lina Seduikyte & Armanda Teixeira-Gomes & Ana Mendes & Anatolijs Borodinecs & Deimante Buzinskaite, 2020. "Aging, Living Environment, and Sustainability: What Should be Taken into Account?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Queena K. Qian & Winky K. O. Ho & Wadu M. Jayantha & Edwin H. W. Chan & Ying Xu, 2022. "Aging-in-Place and Home Modifications for Urban Regeneration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Emma Mulliner & Mike Riley & Vida Maliene, 2020. "Older People’s Preferences for Housing and Environment Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Shilpi Mittal & Jayprakash Chadchan & Sudipta K. Mishra, 2020. "Review of Concepts, Tools and Indices for the Assessment of Urban Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 187-214, May.
    5. Grove, Hannah, 2021. "Ageing as well as you can in place: Applying a geographical lens to the capability approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    6. James, Amity & Crowe, Adam & Tually, Selina & Sharam, Andrea & Faulkner, Debbie & Cebulla, Andreas & Hodgson, Helen & Webb, Eileen & Coram, Veronica & Singh, Ranjodh, 2022. "Housing aspirations of precariously housed older Australians," SocArXiv 2t6xs, Center for Open Science.
    7. Wiles, Janine L. & Rolleston, Anna & Pillai, Avinesh & Broad, Joanna & Teh, Ruth & Gott, Merryn & Kerse, Ngaire, 2017. "Attachment to place in advanced age: A study of the LiLACS NZ cohort," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 27-37.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:31:y:2016:i:6:p:714-728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.