IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i39p4539-4562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual and strategic behaviors in a dynamic extraction problem: results from a within-subject experiment in continuous time

Author

Listed:
  • M. Djiguemde
  • D. Dubois
  • A. Sauquet
  • M. Tidball

Abstract

We conduct a laboratory experiment to test a continuous-time model that represents a dynamic groundwater extraction problem in an infinite horizon. We compare the observations to the equilibrium path of the usual behaviours, for the case where the player is alone in extracting the resource (optimal control) and when two players extract the same resource simultaneously (differential game). We use a within-subjects design. This allows us to identify individual profiles of players playing alone and then characterize groups based on their composition with respect to these individual behaviours. We find that approximately a quarter of the players and groups succeed in playing (significantly) optimally, and none behave myopically. Moreover having an agent that behaved optimally in the control in the pair increases the likelihood that the group cooperates. We also identify other categories of players and groups that allows us to classify an additional 50% of the observations.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Djiguemde & D. Dubois & A. Sauquet & M. Tidball, 2023. "Individual and strategic behaviors in a dynamic extraction problem: results from a within-subject experiment in continuous time," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(39), pages 4539-4562, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:39:p:4539-4562
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2129576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2129576
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2129576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:39:p:4539-4562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.