IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i23p2624-2644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rationality of rainy day savers: objective and subjective determinants of individual savings in Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Cusimano
  • Chiara Paola Donegani
  • Ian Jackson
  • Stephen McKay

Abstract

Using the largest and richest data on savings in Great Britain, six waves of the Wealth and Assets Survey from the Office for National Statistics, we compare standard life cycle models of saving with models using more ‘subjective’ measures, and the added dimension of longitudinal data. Whilst the life cycle model provides a benchmark, regular criticisms remain, particularly people’s propensity to continue saving at older ages. Data on attitudes attenuate that issue, and panel data largely eliminate it. Our results confirm empirically, for Great Britain, the importance of some of the objective determinants of savings included in life cycle theory. When we look at more subjective ones, we show that other factors, including self-rated health and financial pressure, provide an enhanced direct explanation of the propensity to save. Individuals who regard themselves as ‘rainy day savers’ tended to save more, irrespective of their demographic or financial circumstances. Results are robust to different specifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Cusimano & Chiara Paola Donegani & Ian Jackson & Stephen McKay, 2023. "The rationality of rainy day savers: objective and subjective determinants of individual savings in Britain," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 2624-2644, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:23:p:2624-2644
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2103507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2103507
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2103507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:23:p:2624-2644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.