IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i19p2146-2166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does perceived environmental pollution affect migration interests: adapt or flee?

Author

Listed:
  • Yexin Zhou
  • Bo Yuan
  • Bin Liang
  • Qi Cui
  • Shengling Zhang
  • Juan He

Abstract

We utilized the China Genuine Progress Indicator Survey, a unique national survey data from China, to explore the effects of individuals’ perceived pollution on their migration interests. Results show a significantly positive effect of perceived environmental pollution on an individual’s migration interests. A higher level of perceived pollution increases the possibility of migration by 6.5%. Meanwhile, adaptive behaviours such as using facemasks, air cleaners, or water cleaners could not be alternatives to migration. In particular, well-educated, young, high-income groups, as well as those engaged in professional and technical work, are more affected by perceptions about environmental pollution. They are likely to show higher levels of perceived pollution, which could possibly lead to the brain drain effect. Moreover, people’s environmental attitudes have moderating effects on the migration interests triggered by pollution. Our focus on potential population outflow can bear new implications for the formulation of forward-looking environmental policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yexin Zhou & Bo Yuan & Bin Liang & Qi Cui & Shengling Zhang & Juan He, 2023. "How does perceived environmental pollution affect migration interests: adapt or flee?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 2146-2166, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:19:p:2146-2166
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2102130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2102130
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2102130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:19:p:2146-2166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.