IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v51y2019i24p2654-2668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of trade openness on labour force participation rate

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Ali Madanizadeh
  • Hanifa Pilvar

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the impact of trade openness on labour force participation rate. We use tariff rate as the main indicator of trade openness and we employ the number of regional trade agreements and the average tariff rate in the neighbours’ countries as instrumental variables to diminish the endogeneity problem of the tariff rate. We find that trade openness increases the participation rate which is economically and statistically significant. The results show that this correlation is robust under controlling for different variables and using various specifications. We find that 10 percentage point increase in tariff rate lowers the participation rate by 4–6 percentage point and this relationship is more severe in the long run. Finally, we show that changes in labour force population accounts for about 27% of changes in the unemployment rate following a trade liberalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Ali Madanizadeh & Hanifa Pilvar, 2019. "The impact of trade openness on labour force participation rate," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 2654-2668, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:51:y:2019:i:24:p:2654-2668
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2018.1558350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2018.1558350
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2018.1558350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mina Baliamoune, 2022. "Trade and Youth Labor Market Outcomes: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications," Research papers & Policy papers on Economic Trends and Policies 2239, Policy Center for the New South.
    2. Adnan Khaliq, 2019. "The Impact of Public Health Policy on Labor Force Participation in Paksitan: A Bound Test Approuch," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 135-166, December.
    3. Philip Nwosa & Sunday Keji & Samuel Adegboyo & Oluwadamilola Fasina, 2020. "Trade Openness And Unemployment Rate In Nigeria," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 52-62, September.
    4. Liu, Zhen & Ngo, Thanh Quang & Saydaliev, Hayot Berk & He, Huiyuan & Ali, Sajid, 2022. "How do trade openness, public expenditure and institutional performance affect unemployment in OIC countries? Evidence from the DCCE approach," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    5. Rulia Akhtar & Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Nusrat Jafrin & Sharifah Muhairah Shahabudin, 2023. "Economic growth, gender inequality, openness of trade, and female labour force participation: a nonlinear ARDL approach," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1725-1752, June.
    6. Ma, Yong & Chen, Diandian, 2020. "Openness, rural-urban inequality, and happiness in China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    7. Rorisang Lesaoana & Leseko Makhetha, 2024. "Gender-Trade Issues: The Effect of AGOA on Female Participation in African Labour Markets," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 155-175.
    8. Tang, Jianjun & Gong, Jiaowei & Ma, Wanglin & Rahut, Dil Bahadur, 2022. "Narrowing urban–rural income gap in China: The role of the targeted poverty alleviation program," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 74-90.
    9. repec:ocp:rpaper:pp-0222 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:51:y:2019:i:24:p:2654-2668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.