IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Comment on 'Correcting for Simulation Bias in Monte Carlo Methods to Value Exotic Options in Models Driven by Levy Processes' by C. Ribeiro and N. Webber

Listed author(s):
  • Martin Becker
Registered author(s):

    Ribeiro and Webber (2006) propose a method to correct for simulation bias in the Monte Carlo valuation of options with pay-offs depending on the extreme value(s) of the underlying which is driven by a special Levy process, namely a normal inverse Gaussian (NIG) or a variance gamma (VG) process. The proposed method was already successfully used by Beaglehole et al. (1997) and El Babsiri and Noel (1998) when the underlying follows a Brownian motion. Unfortunately, Ribeiro and Webber, in their attempt to exploit well-known subordinator representations of NIG and VG processes, overlook the fact that these subordinator representations lead to discontinuous subordinators. Therefore their correction method 'overcorrects' the simulation bias by magnitudes, resulting in a much bigger simulation bias with reversed sign. We point out where the assumption of a continuous subordinator is implicitly used in the paper of Ribeiro and Webber (2006). Furthermore, by applying the unbiased Monte Carlo valuation approach for Barrier options under VG models of Becker (2009) to the barrier and lookback options considered in Ribeiro and Webber (2006), we show that the newly introduced simulation bias exceeds the corrected simulation bias by far.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Mathematical Finance.

    Volume (Year): 17 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 133-146

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:17:y:2010:i:2:p:133-146
    DOI: 10.1080/13504860903137538
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:17:y:2010:i:2:p:133-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.