IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The dividend reinvestment plan puzzle

Listed author(s):
  • Harold Bierman
Registered author(s):

    It is a rare Fortune 500 firm that does not offer its shareholders the opportunity to participate in a dividend reinvestment plan (a DRIP). There are a wide variety of plans but the typical plan has zero transaction cost for the investors. Some plans offer a price discount from the market price. The puzzle is, 'Why do dividend reinvestment plans exist?' If tax effects are ignored, the dividend policy of a firm does not matter. If taxes are considered and there are significant taxes, both retention and share repurchase are more desirable than the payment of dividends. Arguments are offered that dividends reduce risk, act as discipline on management, and supply information to the market. But all three of those objectives can be obtained in alternative ways. In some situations a dividend payment might reduce the transaction costs incurred by investors who want cash flow from the firm, but normally the saving in transaction costs is not significant. Thus most academics interested in finance argue in favour of either constant dividends or reducing them to zero. Most corporations that can afford to pay dividends, pay them. It is conventional corporate finance policy to increase dividends systematically. On top of this dividend policy puzzle we now have the dividend reinvestment plan puzzle. If investors want to reinvest in a firm, why does the firm not retain earnings?

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Financial Economics.

    Volume (Year): 7 (1997)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 267-271

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:7:y:1997:i:3:p:267-271
    DOI: 10.1080/096031097333628
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:7:y:1997:i:3:p:267-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.