IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apfiec/v17y2007i3p215-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-autocorrelation in the New Zealand stock market

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Choi
  • Xin Zhao

Abstract

We examine the New Zealand stock market for evidence of cross-autocorrelation. We find some evidence of both Lo and MacKinlay's (1990) size effect and Chordia and Swaminathan's (2000) volume effect. Moreover, in the size portfolios, the results of cross-autocorrelations are consistent with the findings of Li and Xu (2002) published in Applied Economics Letters. In the size-volume portfolios, this study reveals a special characteristic of the New Zealand stock market that lagged returns of a larger-volume portfolio may not always lead returns of a smaller-volume portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Choi & Xin Zhao, 2007. "Cross-autocorrelation in the New Zealand stock market," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 215-219.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:17:y:2007:i:3:p:215-219
    DOI: 10.1080/09603100600675508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09603100600675508
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Rutledge & Zhaohui Zhang & Khondkar Karim, 2008. "Is There a Size Effect in the Pricing of Stocks in the Chinese Stock Markets?: The Case of Bull Versus Bear Markets," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 15(2), pages 117-133, June.
    2. Ikram ul Haq & Kashif Rashid, 2014. "Stock Market Efficiency and Size of the Firm: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Oeconomics of Knowledge, Saphira Publishing House, vol. 6(1), pages 10-31, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:17:y:2007:i:3:p:215-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.