IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v28y2021i2p109-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge production in the co-invention process: the influence of knowledge similarity on co-invention performance

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Huo

Abstract

I model the dynamics of the amount of knowledge being learnt and created in the co-invention process between two inventors, by highlighting interpersonal knowledge similarity. Further, I employ U.S. inventor-dyad-level patent data (including 250,546 inventor-dyads) to examine the relationship between knowledge similarity and co-invention performance of the two-inventor teams. The preliminary findings are consistent with the model that predicts a left-skewed inverted U-shaped relationship, suggesting that co-invention performance measured by number of patents is better in teams that consist of inventors with a medium level of similarity in technological knowledge prior to the co-invention process, and that the performance measured by weighted patents is better in teams with more technologically dissimilar members. The study enriches the literature on economics of innovation by explicating knowledge production of inventors in the co-invention process and revealing the left-skewed inverted U-shaped relationship between knowledge similarity and knowledge production performance. In practices, the study suggests assembling teams with technologically dissimilar members for optimal knowledge production performance, especially for the purpose of producing high-quality inventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Huo, 2021. "Knowledge production in the co-invention process: the influence of knowledge similarity on co-invention performance," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 109-114, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:109-114
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1734525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2020.1734525
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2020.1734525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:109-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.